Check our other sites: | Pen Computing | Digital Camera | Scuba Diver Info | Digital Camera Roundup | Rugged PC Review | BBW Magazine
 

 

Reviews

TomTom Navigator 2004
This Pocket PC-based system for your car has superb graphics and an excellent Bluetooth GPS

TomTom Navigator 2004 for Pocket PC consists of mapping and navigation software and a very small (3.25 x 1.25 x 0.625) Bluetooth GPS receiver with both a standard and a car power adapter. The only other thing in the package is a small but very well done 14-page manual.

The software comes on no less than eight CDs (with DVDs now so common, why not using a DVD instead?). First it asks if you want to install for Pocket PC or for a Palm device. You get to a menu where you can install the application, voices, maps, or go online. Install the application while the device is connected and then select what map(s) you want to load into the Pocket PC. There are state and regional maps of all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and Canada. Maps size ranges from two to 225 MB. I picked the entire Western States, which uses 142MB. Which means that even in a Pocket PC with ample RAM you probably want to install the maps on a big memory card. The installation procedure itself tries to be ultra-simple, but I ran into a couple of logical glitches that required a reboot.

TomTom must be activated before you can use it. For that you need the activation code on the disk, and a device code which the software displays on your Pocket PC once it's started. You then have to go to the www.ttcode.com website and enter both codes to get an activation code. That you enter into the Pocket PC and you'll be rewarded with a ãProduct West now activated.ä But what about the rest of my many maps? A cumbersome and somewhat obnoxious procedure. Does TomTom think the first thing you'll do is burn copies of all eight CDs and distribute them to your 50 closest friends?

You can pick any of 12 languages for the voice prompts and are then given the choice of adding your home address via a simple system. Then you are prompted to pick your GPS. I used the silver TomTom Bluetooth puck which configured itself without any fuss or muss or manual intervention. That done, you're invited to a brief tour of TomTom that guides you through the entire application.

Compared to most of the competition, TomTom is a model of simplicity. Start the application and it automatically starts Bluetooth and makes the connection. I cannot overemphasize how important that is. Most systems I have used either constantly complained about weak or lost signals or took forever to find and lock onto satellites, or both. And almost all were cumbersome to set up. The TomTom system works as close to totally transparent as I've seen. You do, of course, have to sign off on the obligatory ãI understand that I am not to operate this by myself while I am drivingä warning screen.

To go from one place to another you simply tap on ãPlan from A to Bä which opens the ãDepart from:ä screen where you can select from favorites, addresses, recent destinations, points of interest, or a particular GPS position. Once the departure point is selected, the ãPick a destination:ä screen pops up and you select where you want to go to via the same choices. TomTom will then show a map of the entire route, including total miles and an estimate of how long it will take. You can also peruse step-by-step route instructions and list those with either distance or time information. Now you're ready to go. Hop in your car, place the little GPS unit somewhere on the dash (it has a rubberized bottom but no obvious way to secure it), and mount your Pocket PC in a place where you can see it. The TomTom kit doesn't include a PDA mount, but those are available from many sources. Flex neck mounts with suction cups are most convenient, but I prefer fixed mounts that don't vibrate and shake as much.

Using the TomTom Navigator on the road is sheer pleasure. Someone clearly put an awful lot of thought into the design and graphic representation of this system. I'd call the primary graphic representation style a ãmodified bird's eye view.ä It's a what a low-flying bird would see, and it is quite close to what you, as the driver, actually see of the road, and you can even zoom in and out. To most people, this view is much easier to comprehend than having to look at a map with a dot on it. I love it. A map means you have to constantly correlate what you see on the map to what you see in real life. That's easy for some, and nearly impossible for others. The TomTom view is much simpler. It's close to the mapping equivalent of what-you-see-is-what-you-get. It's actually even easy to project a few years into the future and imagine a TomTom-like system that pretty much shows you what you actually see with your eyes. Full 3-D mapping of photographic rendering quality. You'd actually be seeing on the system what you're driving through. But since we're not quite there yet, Tom Tom's current approach is the next best thing. Another cool thing is that TomTom shows you gas stations icons and such, so you always know what you'll find at an exit.

You can also toggle between a day view and a night view all in dark blues, with lights and stars twinkling above the horizon. I used the night view extensively, with the only problem being that the car is represented by a barely visible blue triangle on a blue road.

There are other areas where TomTom stands above most of the competition. After having plotted a route for you, some systems get befuddled if you miss a turn or decide to go another way. Some insist you turn around and are totally unwilling to adapt to the new route unless you stop the car and reprogram the thing. Others begin recalculating the route, often leaving you without guidance when you need the system most. Tom Tom, on the other hand, is unusually flexible and fleet-footed when it comes to changes and situations it doesn't expect. On one of my trips the system made an obvious mistake, routing me though a detour for no good reason at all. I ignored that and took the shorter way. When TomTom realized I was not following its route, it ãthoughtä for perhaps two seconds, then simply resumed giving me directions based on the new route. There are times when even TomTom will stubbornly insist you turn around, but it will eventually see the error in its ways and accommodate to the new situation.

Another total turn-off with many systems is when the receiver loses the satellite signal. Tom Tom's GPS puck almost never loses it.

While TomTom does many things better, and often much better, than most of the competition, it is not perfect. The user interface which places up to six large icons on a screen is simple, but not always obvious until you learn and internalize the commands. The interface also highlights an increasingly bothersome limitation of systems with passive touchscreens: you won't know what an icon does unless you click on it and see for yourself. That is in stark contrast with the active digitizer and mouse-based system where placing the cursor on an icon will usually bring up an explanation of what the command or icon will do before you actually do it.

Further, even TomTom will not do all the navigation work for you. I've often felt that in-car GPS systems work great for people who already know where they are going, but nowhere near as well for those who truly need help. That's because voice prompts often come either too early or too late, or they do not truly reflect what you see on the road. The system may say ãturn rightä but what you see ahead of you is a road with two forks and perhaps an onramp, and it's not clear what ãturn rightä means. TomTom's combination of that terrific bird's eye view and intelligently designed voice commands (ãat end of road, turn rightä or ãturn left, then stay in right laneä) makes things easier, but there are still times when the maps simply fail. In local traffic, sometimes an intersection or side street would be off by as much as a fifty yards, other times it was right on the mark. In situations where you really need help, it's disconcerting when the system shows you should be passing ãDrury Laneä when you are, in fact, between two side streets. TomTom, like all other mapping packages that use the NAVTEQ database, insists that my house number is at the bottom, and not at the end, of my street.

The NAVTEQ data also failed TomTom twice when I tried to navigate to restaurants. The first time it guided me to an empty parking lot about 400 yards away from the Mexican restaurant I had selected as my destination. The second time it didn't list the Mels Diner in my neighborhood, yet listed one 25 miles away. So I picked a Marie Callender restaurant right next to it. The system got us in the general vicinity, but then guided us to the parking lot of a bank a good half mile away from Marie Callendar's.

There are also occasions where TomTom briefly loses it. One time I took a simple highway off-ramp and TomTom flipped. For several seconds, all I saw was the triangle representing my current position floating on an otherwise blank screen. Then the map reappeard. Not good when you're in a tight spot. It most often happens in tight turns, like highway on-ramps, or in situations where TomTom expects you to go one way but you go another. Often it got the distance to a turn wrong (like saying 200 yards when it was right there) or advising to turn after the turn had already been made. Finally, TomTom tended to hang my iPAQ hx4700 when I quit out of it, and a couple of times during operation. I believe this is an issue with the new iPAQ. I notified TomTom of this, but did not get a reply.

On my way to work I decided to stop by a coffee shop off the road to pick up some hot chocolate. TomTom acknowledged my deviation and then patiently waited until I returned to the car. It then did its best to get me back onto the route without a hiccup. It probably went, ãOkay, now that's off the road, and, let's see, I don't know that alley here, but, oh, I know that street. Okay, make a left here and then the next right and we're back on track!ä Excellent.

Another attractive part of TomTom is its inclusion of common-sense features and options. Let's say you see a roadblock ahead, perhaps an accident. Click on the ãAvoid Roadblockä icon, then select how far away the roadblock is (from 100 yards to three miles), and TomTom will try to find an alternate to get around it. You can also specify waypoints. When you want to find points of interest, they are listed by distance from your current location.

Overall, TomTom is a remarkable achievement with only a few problems. TomTom excels with seamless hardware integration between PDA and GPS receiver, an excellent quasi-bird's eye view that everyone loved and that is far simpler than a map view, and a common sense approach to alternate routes or getting back on track. On the other hand, the interface is not perfect, and the at times blatant errors with addresses or early/late prompts came unexpected (though they are a NAVTEQ issue and not a TomTom error). And there were the freezing problems on my iPAQ 4700. Once this is fixed, TomTom will be very hard to beat.

öConrad Blickenstorfer

Home

 

© HHCMAG.com. All Rights Reserved.
Dreamweaver-Templates.org